PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.18%
Positive growth while 8420.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.37%
Cost increase while 8420.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-7.57%
Gross profit decline while 8420.HK shows 58.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.54%
Margin decline while 8420.HK shows 929.17% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.26%
G&A growth while 8420.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
269.41%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of 8420.HK's 371.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
174.54%
Operating expenses growth while 8420.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.68%
Total costs growth while 8420.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-65.02%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-656.37%
EBITDA decline while 8420.HK shows 101.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-640.23%
EBITDA margin decline while 8420.HK shows 111.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-212.57%
Operating income decline while 8420.HK shows 88.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-205.90%
Operating margin decline while 8420.HK shows 24.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
442.41%
Other expenses growth while 8420.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-176.58%
Pre-tax income decline while 8420.HK shows 89.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-170.68%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8420.HK shows 32.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
67.78%
Tax expense growth while 8420.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-603.32%
Net income decline while 8420.HK shows 88.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-588.31%
Net margin decline while 8420.HK shows 28.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-496.23%
EPS decline while 8420.HK shows 88.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-507.69%
Diluted EPS decline while 8420.HK shows 88.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.52%
Share count change of 17.52% while 8420.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
15.11%
Diluted share change of 15.11% while 8420.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.