0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.85%
Positive growth while 8420.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.22%
Cost increase while 8420.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-29.27%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.94%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
728.34%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x 8420.HK's 200.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-54.94%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.18%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-13.63%
Interest expense reduction while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.77%
D&A reduction while 8420.HK shows 9.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
130.33%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x 8420.HK's 14.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
117.60%
EBITDA margin growth while 8420.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.78%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x 8420.HK's 2.13%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
85.62%
Operating margin growth while 8420.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-164.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
88.71%
Pre-tax income growth while 8420.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.33%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8420.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.77%
Tax expense growth less than half of 8420.HK's 900.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
88.71%
Net income growth while 8420.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.33%
Net margin growth while 8420.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.31%
EPS change of 92.31% while 8420.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
92.31%
Diluted EPS change of 92.31% while 8420.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
58.99%
Share count increase while 8420.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
58.99%
Diluted share increase while 8420.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.