PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
46.55%
Positive growth while 8420.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
43.93%
Cost increase while 8420.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
79.37%
Positive growth while 8420.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.40%
Margin change of 22.40% while 8420.HK shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
725.28%
G&A growth while 8420.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-270.12%
Other expenses reduction while 8420.HK shows 4666.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
655.55%
Operating expenses growth while 8420.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
92.72%
Total costs growth while 8420.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.33%
Interest expense reduction while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.40%
D&A growth while 8420.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-642.83%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-470.42%
EBITDA margin decline while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3947.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2661.87%
Operating margin decline while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2732.16%
Other expenses reduction while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6299.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4267.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
101.73%
Tax expense growth while 8420.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6318.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4279.98%
Net margin decline while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5733.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5733.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.22%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x 8420.HK's 11.46%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.21%
Diluted share increase while 8420.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.