PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.23%
Revenue decline while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.87%
Cost reduction while 8420.HK shows 5806.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-57.09%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.55%
Margin decline while 8420.HK shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.05%
G&A reduction while 8420.HK shows 186.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense growth less than half of 8420.HK's 999.83%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while 8420.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-79.30%
Operating expenses reduction while 8420.HK shows 2338.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-30.90%
Total costs reduction while 8420.HK shows 432.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.13%
D&A reduction while 8420.HK shows 111.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
110.03%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x 8420.HK's 67.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
111.56%
Margin change of 111.56% while 8420.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
85.80%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x 8420.HK's 28.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
83.63%
Margin change of 83.63% while 8420.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
110.02%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x 8420.HK's 96.71%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
88.47%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x 8420.HK's 65.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
86.71%
Margin change of 86.71% while 8420.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-100.00%
Tax expense reduction while 8420.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
88.51%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x 8420.HK's 76.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
86.75%
Margin change of 86.75% while 8420.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
88.57%
Similar EPS growth to 8420.HK's 83.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
88.57%
Similar diluted EPS growth to 8420.HK's 99.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-1.15%
Share count reduction while 8420.HK shows 18.63% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.20%
Diluted share reduction while 8420.HK shows 2637.50% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.