PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.07%
Positive growth while 8436.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.84%
Cost increase while 8436.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
64.93%
Positive growth while 8436.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
39.68%
Margin expansion while 8436.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-373.77%
G&A reduction while 8436.HK shows 92.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8590.30%
Other expenses growth while 8436.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.57%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8436.HK's 18.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.33%
Total costs growth while 8436.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-60.41%
Interest expense reduction while 8436.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-34.32%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
124.33%
EBITDA growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.99%
EBITDA margin growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
122.92%
Operating income growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
88.80%
Operating margin growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.60%
Other expenses growth while 8436.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
132.97%
Pre-tax income growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
97.31%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
258.94%
Tax expense growth while 8436.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
112.04%
Net income growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.58%
Net margin growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.76%
EPS growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.76%
Diluted EPS growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.