0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.94%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
8.29%
Cost increase while 8436.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-68.03%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.41%
Margin decline while 8436.HK shows 84.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
226.78%
G&A growth above 1.5x 8436.HK's 110.72%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.59%
Other expenses growth while 8436.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
244.73%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 8436.HK's 38.59%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
36.38%
Total costs growth while 8436.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-49.13%
Interest expense reduction while 8436.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
225.30%
D&A growth while 8436.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-205.37%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-223.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-205.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-224.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
103.06%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8436.HK's 234.67%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-209.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-228.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.10%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-233.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-256.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-233.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-233.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.