PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.18%
Positive growth while 8436.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.27%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
22.71%
Positive growth while 8436.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.49%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x 8436.HK's 6.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.56%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.80%
Similar other expenses growth to 8436.HK's 131.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-29.51%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.19%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
14.81%
Interest expense change of 14.81% while 8436.HK maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
206.40%
EBITDA growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
205.86%
EBITDA margin growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.91%
Operating income growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.95%
Operating margin growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-29.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
400.47%
Pre-tax income growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
399.94%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
250.03%
Tax expense growth while 8436.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
342.44%
Net income growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
342.01%
Net margin growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
342.50%
EPS growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
342.50%
Diluted EPS growth while 8436.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.