PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.09%
Revenue decline while 8436.HK shows 100.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.73%
Cost reduction while 8436.HK shows 118.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-21.10%
Gross profit decline while 8436.HK shows 66.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-17.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.76%
Similar G&A growth to 8436.HK's 8.85%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
14.94%
Similar operating expenses growth to 8436.HK's 19.25%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-1.70%
Total costs reduction while 8436.HK shows 94.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.84%
Interest expense growth less than half of 8436.HK's 439.19%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.63%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2021.04%
EBITDA decline while 8436.HK shows 33.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2111.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-139.60%
Operating income decline while 8436.HK shows 110.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-141.29%
Operating margin decline while 8436.HK shows 5.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1009.17%
Other expenses growth while 8436.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-336.26%
Pre-tax income decline while 8436.HK shows 101.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-346.34%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8436.HK shows 0.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.31%
Tax expense reduction while 8436.HK shows 128.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-473.02%
Net income decline while 8436.HK shows 97.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-488.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-387.50%
EPS decline while 8436.HK shows 97.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-387.50%
Diluted EPS decline while 8436.HK shows 97.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.00%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x 8436.HK's 0.02%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.