PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.58%
Revenue decline while 8436.HK shows 181.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.59%
Cost growth less than half of 8436.HK's 161.59%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-99.48%
Gross profit decline while 8436.HK shows 230.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-99.48%
Margin decline while 8436.HK shows 17.28% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.35%
G&A reduction while 8436.HK shows 4.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.35%
Operating expenses reduction while 8436.HK shows 21.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.48%
Total costs growth less than half of 8436.HK's 118.06%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.85%
Interest expense growth less than half of 8436.HK's 536.84%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.16%
D&A growth less than half of 8436.HK's 30.95%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-10.59%
EBITDA decline while 8436.HK shows 3863.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.23%
EBITDA margin decline while 8436.HK shows 1435.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.70%
Operating income decline while 8436.HK shows 2332.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.35%
Operating margin decline while 8436.HK shows 892.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.93%
Other expenses growth while 8436.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.19%
Pre-tax income decline while 8436.HK shows 3591.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8436.HK shows 1338.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.48%
Tax expense reduction while 8436.HK shows 653.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.69%
Net income decline while 8436.HK shows 2023.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.33%
Net margin decline while 8436.HK shows 782.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.13%
EPS decline while 8436.HK shows 2000.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.12%
Diluted EPS decline while 8436.HK shows 2000.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.40%
Share count reduction below 50% of 8436.HK's 1.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.77%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of 8436.HK's 1.26%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.