PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.09%
Revenue decline while 8480.HK shows 40.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.73%
Cost reduction while 8480.HK shows 34.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-21.10%
Gross profit decline while 8480.HK shows 54.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-17.74%
Margin decline while 8480.HK shows 9.97% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.76%
G&A growth less than half of 8480.HK's 18.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
14.94%
Operating expenses growth while 8480.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.70%
Total costs reduction while 8480.HK shows 19.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.84%
Interest expense growth less than half of 8480.HK's 35.24%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.63%
D&A reduction while 8480.HK shows 17.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2021.04%
EBITDA decline while 8480.HK shows 628.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2111.53%
EBITDA margin decline while 8480.HK shows 418.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-139.60%
Operating income decline while 8480.HK shows 687.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-141.29%
Operating margin decline while 8480.HK shows 518.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1009.17%
Other expenses growth while 8480.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-336.26%
Pre-tax income decline while 8480.HK shows 663.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-346.34%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8480.HK shows 501.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.31%
Tax expense reduction while 8480.HK shows 121.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-473.02%
Net income decline while 8480.HK shows 346.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-488.94%
Net margin decline while 8480.HK shows 275.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-387.50%
EPS decline while 8480.HK shows 346.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-387.50%
Diluted EPS decline while 8480.HK shows 346.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.00%
Share count change of 0.00% while 8480.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.