PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.18%
Positive growth while 8480.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.37%
Cost increase while 8480.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-7.57%
Gross profit decline while 8480.HK shows 37.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.54%
Margin decline while 8480.HK shows 43.65% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
153.26%
G&A growth while 8480.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
269.41%
Other expenses growth while 8480.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
174.54%
Operating expenses growth while 8480.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.68%
Total costs growth while 8480.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-65.02%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-656.37%
EBITDA decline while 8480.HK shows 129.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-640.23%
EBITDA margin decline while 8480.HK shows 130.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-212.57%
Operating income decline while 8480.HK shows 102.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-205.90%
Operating margin decline while 8480.HK shows 102.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
442.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8480.HK's 1018.12%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-176.58%
Pre-tax income decline while 8480.HK shows 120.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-170.68%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8480.HK shows 120.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
67.78%
Tax expense growth while 8480.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-603.32%
Net income decline while 8480.HK shows 111.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-588.31%
Net margin decline while 8480.HK shows 112.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-496.23%
EPS decline while 8480.HK shows 111.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-507.69%
Diluted EPS decline while 8480.HK shows 111.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.52%
Share count change of 17.52% while 8480.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
15.11%
Diluted share change of 15.11% while 8480.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.