0.14 - 0.14
0.08 - 0.20
5.0K / 202.5K (Avg.)
-6.75 | -0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.58%
Revenue decline while 8480.HK shows 116887.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.59%
Cost growth less than half of 8480.HK's 114617.00%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-99.48%
Gross profit decline while 8480.HK shows 123450.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-99.48%
Margin decline while 8480.HK shows 5.61% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.35%
G&A reduction while 8480.HK shows 96910.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.35%
Operating expenses reduction while 8480.HK shows 101823.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.48%
Total costs growth less than half of 8480.HK's 111781.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.85%
Interest expense growth less than half of 8480.HK's 138471.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.16%
D&A growth less than half of 8480.HK's 86.39%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-10.59%
EBITDA decline while 8480.HK shows 59.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.70%
Operating income decline while 8480.HK shows 226748.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.35%
Operating margin decline while 8480.HK shows 93.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.93%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8480.HK's 298945.78%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-9.19%
Pre-tax income decline while 8480.HK shows 160874.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8480.HK shows 37.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.48%
Tax expense reduction while 8480.HK shows 112471.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.69%
Net income decline while 8480.HK shows 172623.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.33%
Net margin decline while 8480.HK shows 47.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.13%
EPS decline while 8480.HK shows 166566.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.12%
Diluted EPS decline while 8480.HK shows 166566.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.40%
Share count reduction below 50% of 8480.HK's 2.66%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.77%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x 8480.HK's 2.66%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.