PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.08%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
12.84%
D&A growth of 12.84% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-21.11%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.66%
SBC growth of 5.66% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-298.88%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-132.40%
AR is negative yoy while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-114.93%
Negative yoy inventory while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
76.15%
AP growth of 76.15% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
6.29%
Growth of 6.29% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.10%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-96.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
19.57%
Purchases growth of 19.57% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-17.10%
We reduce yoy sales while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
42.86%
Growth of 42.86% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
14.96%
We expand invests by 14.96% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.42%
Negative yoy issuance while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.