PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
59.04%
Net income growth at 50-75% of GPRO's 96.86%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
61.88%
D&A growth well above GPRO's 38.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
247.79%
Deferred tax of 247.79% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
21.65%
SBC growth while GPRO is negative at -51.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
922.92%
Well above GPRO's 101.59% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
79.59%
AR growth well above GPRO's 131.91%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-300.60%
Negative yoy inventory while GPRO is 16.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
204.66%
AP growth of 204.66% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
546.99%
Growth of 546.99% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.41%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of GPRO's 217.16%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
29.88%
CapEx growth well above GPRO's 16.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-9.75%
We reduce yoy sales while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-750.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-213.49%
We reduce yoy invests while GPRO stands at 16.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.24%
Negative yoy issuance while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.