PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.73%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 78.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.12%
Some D&A expansion while GPRO is negative at -3.59%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-27.12%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GPRO stands at 93.26%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.52%
Less SBC growth vs. GPRO's 7.42%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-2071.59%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GPRO is 150.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-138.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GPRO at -154.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-315.24%
Negative yoy inventory while GPRO is 115.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
96.99%
Lower AP growth vs. GPRO's 208.83%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-95.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GPRO at -427.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.40%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 168.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
12.31%
Some CapEx rise while GPRO is negative at -230.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-860.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
5.58%
Purchases growth of 5.58% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
16.57%
Liquidation growth of 16.57% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-131.71%
We reduce yoy other investing while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.68%
We have mild expansions while GPRO is negative at -230.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.85%
Negative yoy issuance while GPRO is 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.