PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.87%
Net income growth under 50% of GPRO's 4071.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.25%
Less D&A growth vs. GPRO's 14.04%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-343.92%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-3.98%
Negative yoy SBC while GPRO is 30.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
175.41%
Well above GPRO's 105.92% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-142.91%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GPRO at -2502.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
85.18%
Some inventory rise while GPRO is negative at -305.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
2326.42%
AP growth well above GPRO's 534.74%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
140.15%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. GPRO's 636.04%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.57%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of GPRO's 252.03%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-14.38%
Negative yoy CapEx while GPRO is 44.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
63.19%
Acquisition growth of 63.19% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
37.84%
Purchases growth of 37.84% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-22.85%
We reduce yoy sales while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
129.47%
Growth of 129.47% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
109.39%
Investing outflow well above GPRO's 0.70%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
225.00%
Stock issuance far above GPRO's 419.05%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
69.31%
Buyback growth of 69.31% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.