PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.21%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 173.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.13%
Less D&A growth vs. GPRO's 14.46%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
35.86%
Some yoy growth while GPRO is negative at -541.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
4.02%
SBC growth while GPRO is negative at -59.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-1600.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GPRO is 267.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-124.16%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GPRO at -2000.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-19.80%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with GPRO at -545.29%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
98.52%
Lower AP growth vs. GPRO's 739.84%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-143.48%
Negative yoy usage while GPRO is 69.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.25%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 528.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-63.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -28.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-897.06%
Negative yoy acquisition while GPRO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-67.53%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-8.01%
We reduce yoy sales while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
207.14%
We have some outflow growth while GPRO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-289.20%
We reduce yoy invests while GPRO stands at 6.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.59%
Negative yoy issuance while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
72.18%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of GPRO's 100.00%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.