PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
112.87%
Some net income increase while GPRO is negative at -86.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
30.78%
D&A growth well above GPRO's 3.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
372.24%
Well above GPRO's 87.87% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
16.54%
Less SBC growth vs. GPRO's 37.62%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
251.10%
Well above GPRO's 142.18% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
111.47%
AR growth well above GPRO's 186.33%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
30.08%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. GPRO's 70.42%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
6.31%
A yoy AP increase while GPRO is negative at -157.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
1331.82%
Some yoy usage while GPRO is negative at -118.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.51%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GPRO's 53.43%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
15.24%
Some CapEx rise while GPRO is negative at -12.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
99.20%
Some acquisitions while GPRO is negative at -580.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
20.46%
Purchases well above GPRO's 22.75%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-59.24%
We reduce yoy sales while GPRO is 1054.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
622.22%
We have some outflow growth while GPRO is negative at -6074.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-806.21%
We reduce yoy invests while GPRO stands at 28.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -87.75%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
70.41%
Buyback growth of 70.41% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.