PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.72%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 109.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.73%
Negative yoy D&A while GPRO is 19.61%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-114.47%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
4.39%
SBC growth while GPRO is negative at -31.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-75.85%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GPRO at -31.91%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
672.84%
AR growth while GPRO is negative at -115.60%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
34.30%
Some inventory rise while GPRO is negative at -399.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-260.29%
Negative yoy AP while GPRO is 300.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-94.92%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GPRO at -8948.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.42%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GPRO at -0.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.17%
Some CapEx rise while GPRO is negative at -208.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-300.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -931.49%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-6.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 58.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
3.15%
Below 50% of GPRO's 75.50%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-64.62%
We reduce yoy other investing while GPRO is 83.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-5.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -3.25%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-125.16%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
186.25%
We slightly raise equity while GPRO is negative at -44.25%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-38.57%
We cut yoy buybacks while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.