PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.31%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with GPRO at -46.34%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
24.41%
D&A growth well above GPRO's 18.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
395.91%
Well above GPRO's 95.42% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-7.66%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GPRO at -1.75%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-123.51%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GPRO at -426.52%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-90.78%
AR is negative yoy while GPRO is 81.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
413.27%
Some inventory rise while GPRO is negative at -27.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
115.00%
A yoy AP increase while GPRO is negative at -65.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-2.08%
Negative yoy usage while GPRO is 106.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.45%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GPRO at -92.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
15.63%
CapEx growth well above GPRO's 31.16%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-25.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while GPRO stands at 85.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
5.48%
Some yoy expansion while GPRO is negative at -187.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
28.52%
Below 50% of GPRO's 82.50%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while GPRO is negative at -397.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
48.94%
Investing outflow well above GPRO's 7.67%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-27.18%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-93.45%
Negative yoy issuance while GPRO is 8.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-43.47%
We cut yoy buybacks while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.