PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Some net income increase while GPRO is negative at -283.26%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.13%
Less D&A growth vs. GPRO's 26.36%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-252.82%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
6.89%
SBC growth well above GPRO's 1.40%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
57.02%
Less working capital growth vs. GPRO's 176.67%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-1311.03%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GPRO at -1030.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-186.72%
Negative yoy inventory while GPRO is 244.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
300.14%
A yoy AP increase while GPRO is negative at -229.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-95.74%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GPRO at -363.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.09%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 351.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-75.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -71.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
1.74%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. GPRO's 100.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
35.83%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. GPRO's 86.43%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-12.09%
We reduce yoy sales while GPRO is 25.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-447.83%
We reduce yoy other investing while GPRO is 168.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
87.94%
Investing outflow well above GPRO's 125.08%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
41.86%
Debt repayment growth of 41.86% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1360.00%
We slightly raise equity while GPRO is negative at -289.89%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-32.53%
We cut yoy buybacks while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.