PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.87%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with GPRO at -13.40%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.98%
Less D&A growth vs. GPRO's 34.32%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
39.93%
Some yoy growth while GPRO is negative at -135.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
0.57%
Less SBC growth vs. GPRO's 6.10%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
28.66%
Well above GPRO's 35.92% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-86.76%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GPRO at -44.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
164.71%
Some inventory rise while GPRO is negative at -211.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
97.90%
Lower AP growth vs. GPRO's 7750.97%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-651.21%
Negative yoy usage while GPRO is 82.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-43.94%
Negative yoy while GPRO is 4685.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-8.34%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 8.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-11.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -260.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
88.89%
Acquisition spending well above GPRO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
29.50%
Purchases growth of 29.50% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-6.49%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GPRO at -8.14%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-420.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -8.14%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
67.28%
Investing outflow well above GPRO's 119.27%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while GPRO is 51.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-52.48%
We cut yoy buybacks while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.