PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-16.66%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 27.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.70%
Negative yoy D&A while GPRO is 5.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
326.10%
Some yoy growth while GPRO is negative at -1031.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
0.22%
Less SBC growth vs. GPRO's 3.26%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
10.60%
Slight usage while GPRO is negative at -20.67%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-97.44%
AR is negative yoy while GPRO is 6.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
152.24%
Some inventory rise while GPRO is negative at -179.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
106.48%
Lower AP growth vs. GPRO's 985.38%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-166.86%
Negative yoy usage while GPRO is 400.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-85.00%
Negative yoy while GPRO is 221.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-4.24%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 1031.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
22.12%
Some CapEx rise while GPRO is negative at -1281.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
4.55%
Acquisition growth of 4.55% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-29.31%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-56.50%
We reduce yoy sales while GPRO is 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-385.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while GPRO is 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-86.25%
We reduce yoy invests while GPRO stands at 25.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.67%
Buyback growth of 8.67% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.