PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.62%
Net income growth under 50% of GPRO's 216.91%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.34%
Some D&A expansion while GPRO is negative at -24.79%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-53.91%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GPRO stands at 265.19%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.44%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GPRO at -6.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
142.53%
Slight usage while GPRO is negative at -103.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-3996.14%
AR is negative yoy while GPRO is 161.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
14.71%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. GPRO's 118.28%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
1174.40%
A yoy AP increase while GPRO is negative at -145.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
112.63%
Some yoy usage while GPRO is negative at -19.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
86.87%
Some yoy increase while GPRO is negative at -107.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
34.75%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of GPRO's 395.89%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
6.92%
Some CapEx rise while GPRO is negative at -111.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-130.16%
Negative yoy acquisition while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-64.42%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-8.80%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GPRO at -87.50%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
69.96%
We have some outflow growth while GPRO is negative at -75.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-176.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -304.21%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34000.00%
We slightly raise equity while GPRO is negative at -97.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
8.08%
Buyback growth of 8.08% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.