PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
62.47%
Some net income increase while GPRO is negative at -166.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-11.42%
Negative yoy D&A while GPRO is 2.52%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-15.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while GPRO stands at 113.33%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.08%
SBC growth well above GPRO's 8.67%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
96.53%
Slight usage while GPRO is negative at -5.03%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
122.98%
AR growth well above GPRO's 216.22%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
96.43%
Some inventory rise while GPRO is negative at -126.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-106.09%
Both negative yoy AP, with GPRO at -4318.13%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
552.32%
Some yoy usage while GPRO is negative at -111.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
54.49%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. GPRO's 160.38%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
53.27%
Some CFO growth while GPRO is negative at -177.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
24.13%
Lower CapEx growth vs. GPRO's 60.99%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-7269.23%
Negative yoy acquisition while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-106.75%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
29.29%
We have some liquidation growth while GPRO is negative at -65.31%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
74.44%
We have some outflow growth while GPRO is negative at -102.07%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-1612.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -68.06%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
63.39%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of GPRO's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
-99.49%
Negative yoy issuance while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-18.70%
We cut yoy buybacks while GPRO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.