PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with GPRO at -55.69%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.48%
Some D&A expansion while GPRO is negative at -2.13%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-40.47%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.57%
Negative yoy SBC while GPRO is 4.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-131.45%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GPRO is 96.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
340.87%
AR growth while GPRO is negative at -139.67%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-43.61%
Negative yoy inventory while GPRO is 79.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-208.83%
Negative yoy AP while GPRO is 117.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-64.29%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GPRO at -88.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-211.98%
Both negative yoy, with GPRO at -38.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-40.03%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 117.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
10.31%
Some CapEx rise while GPRO is negative at -48.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.45%
Some yoy expansion while GPRO is negative at -3.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-5.91%
We reduce yoy sales while GPRO is 209.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.48%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. GPRO's 450.62%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
42.47%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. GPRO's 417.02%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-75.10%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -17.62%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.