PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
44.77%
Some net income increase while GPRO is negative at -1071.98%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.78%
Some D&A expansion while GPRO is negative at -8.64%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while GPRO is negative at -188.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
27.52%
SBC growth well above GPRO's 7.83%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-3018.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GPRO at -379.84%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
166.96%
AR growth well above GPRO's 148.19%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-515.40%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with GPRO at -205.37%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-139.05%
Negative yoy AP while GPRO is 7.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-39.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GPRO at -143.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-284.30%
Negative yoy while GPRO is 20.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
40.94%
Some CFO growth while GPRO is negative at -362.51%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-15.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -99.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while GPRO is negative at -175.69%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
23.60%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. GPRO's 58.32%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-20.05%
Both yoy lines are negative, with GPRO at -33.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
76.38%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. GPRO's 175.69%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-18.73%
We reduce yoy invests while GPRO stands at 169.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
49.84%
Debt repayment well below GPRO's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.28%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of GPRO's 37.51%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.