PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.46%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 42.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GPRO at -3.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.54%
Negative yoy SBC while GPRO is 7.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
115.43%
Well above GPRO's 106.94% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
24.47%
AR growth while GPRO is negative at -227.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
58.99%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. GPRO's 170.09%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-141.79%
Negative yoy AP while GPRO is 138.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while GPRO is 57.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-346.37%
Both negative yoy, with GPRO at -144.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-16.01%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 88.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.00%
CapEx growth well above GPRO's 1.04%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
49.10%
At 75-90% of GPRO's 65.31%. Bill Ackman would push for additional sales if those assets are non-strategic or have peaked in value.
24.82%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. GPRO's 583.91%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
260.48%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. GPRO's 620.44%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-60.60%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -200.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.