PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.71%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 78.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.31%
Some D&A expansion while GPRO is negative at -17.39%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.57%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GPRO at -9.89%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
224.24%
Slight usage while GPRO is negative at -374.19%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-137.34%
AR is negative yoy while GPRO is 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
97.03%
Some inventory rise while GPRO is negative at -200.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
127.05%
Lower AP growth vs. GPRO's 304.48%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.72%
Well above GPRO's 127.78%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-7.63%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 79.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
28.22%
Lower CapEx growth vs. GPRO's 94.98%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.38%
We have some liquidation growth while GPRO is negative at -21.71%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-377.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -21.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-81.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -21.09%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-233.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.80%
Buyback growth below 50% of GPRO's 33.33%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.