PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.47%
Net income growth under 50% of GPRO's 34.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-13.07%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with GPRO at -19.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
SBC growth well above GPRO's 0.14%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-909.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GPRO is 598.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-367.89%
AR is negative yoy while GPRO is 164.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
4427.27%
Inventory growth well above GPRO's 349.70%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
274.96%
A yoy AP increase while GPRO is negative at -170.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-811.11%
Both negative yoy, with GPRO at -9323.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-18.13%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 2769.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-3.34%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -2129.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.32%
Purchases growth of 12.32% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
7.06%
We have some liquidation growth while GPRO is negative at -65.91%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-15.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -65.91%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
447.83%
We have mild expansions while GPRO is negative at -67.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
73.43%
Debt repayment growth of 73.43% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.