PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
47.74%
Some net income increase while GPRO is negative at -13923.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.35%
D&A growth well above GPRO's 14.32%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.17%
SBC growth while GPRO is negative at -12.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
118.53%
Slight usage while GPRO is negative at -280.39%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
170.51%
AR growth well above GPRO's 38.86%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-114.39%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with GPRO at -151.40%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-130.48%
Both negative yoy AP, with GPRO at -108.30%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.70%
Negative yoy while GPRO is 2921.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
84.72%
Some CFO growth while GPRO is negative at -325.03%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-10.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -80.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
5.00%
Below 50% of GPRO's 60.00%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
51.37%
Growth well above GPRO's 60.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-19.51%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -25.83%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-99.90%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GPRO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while GPRO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.