PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.31%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 85.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.42%
Negative yoy D&A while GPRO is 17.66%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.10%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GPRO at -11.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-613.27%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GPRO is 156.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-82.12%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GPRO at -177.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
238.69%
Inventory growth well above GPRO's 235.76%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-167.90%
Negative yoy AP while GPRO is 136.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.71%
Some yoy increase while GPRO is negative at -135.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-43.13%
Negative yoy CFO while GPRO is 100.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.56%
CapEx growth well above GPRO's 25.73%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.05%
Negative yoy purchasing while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
20.93%
We have some liquidation growth while GPRO is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-56.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-116.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with GPRO at -106.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
20.98%
Debt repayment growth of 20.98% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.22%
We cut yoy buybacks while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.