PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.29%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with GPRO at -352.94%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.14%
Some D&A expansion while GPRO is negative at -2.57%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.38%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GPRO at -29.48%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4457.24%
Slight usage while GPRO is negative at -91.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-2127.28%
AR is negative yoy while GPRO is 200.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-8958.33%
Negative yoy inventory while GPRO is 159.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1276.93%
A yoy AP increase while GPRO is negative at -182.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
319.59%
Some yoy usage while GPRO is negative at -76.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-119.53%
Negative yoy while GPRO is 123.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-7.09%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GPRO at -1018.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-35.19%
Negative yoy CapEx while GPRO is 78.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.80%
Purchases growth of 18.80% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-2.06%
We reduce yoy sales while GPRO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
50.77%
Growth of 50.77% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
1237.80%
Investing outflow well above GPRO's 78.59%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
178.64%
Debt repayment growth of 178.64% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.43%
Buyback growth of 5.43% while GPRO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.