PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.69%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-7.53%
Negative yoy D&A while SONO is 4.69%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
58.41%
Deferred tax of 58.41% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.67%
Less working capital growth vs. SONO's 75.63%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133.81%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONO's 311.49%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.00%
Negative yoy while SONO is 1546.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
16.16%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 162.75%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
31.96%
CapEx growth well above SONO's 14.40%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.69%
Some yoy expansion while SONO is negative at -14.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-35.10%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 17.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
10.62%
Growth of 10.62% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
139.73%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 10.51%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -150.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-15.67%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONO is 88.91%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.