PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
41.86%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
18.18%
D&A growth well above SONO's 4.69%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
53.33%
Deferred tax of 53.33% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.67%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONO is 75.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
119.90%
AR growth while SONO is negative at -216.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-181.82%
Negative yoy inventory while SONO is 311.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-135.19%
Negative yoy AP while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
20.83%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONO's 106.61%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
175.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONO's 1546.08%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
25.00%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 162.75%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-76.47%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 14.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
2.17%
Some yoy expansion while SONO is negative at -14.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-6.90%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 17.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-97.67%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -150.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.