PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
115.79%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 95.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-16.67%
Negative yoy D&A while SONO is 4.69%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
225.00%
Deferred tax of 225.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -3.73%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
115.15%
Well above SONO's 75.63% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-160.53%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -216.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-700.00%
Negative yoy inventory while SONO is 311.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
768.29%
AP growth of 768.29% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-1400.00%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 106.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
140.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONO's 1546.08%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
812.50%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SONO's 162.75%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-26.09%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 14.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.55%
Some yoy expansion while SONO is negative at -14.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-44.73%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 17.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-343.24%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.67%
We slightly raise equity while SONO is negative at -150.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.