PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.08%
Negative net income growth while SONO stands at 95.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
12.84%
D&A growth well above SONO's 4.69%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-21.11%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.66%
SBC growth while SONO is negative at -3.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-298.88%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONO is 75.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-132.40%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -216.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-114.93%
Negative yoy inventory while SONO is 311.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
76.15%
AP growth of 76.15% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
6.29%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONO's 106.61%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.10%
Negative yoy CFO while SONO is 162.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-96.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 14.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
19.57%
Some yoy expansion while SONO is negative at -14.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-17.10%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 17.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
42.86%
Growth of 42.86% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
14.96%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 10.51%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -150.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.