PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.00%
Negative net income growth while SONO stands at 95.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.55%
D&A growth well above SONO's 4.69%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-34.01%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.50%
SBC growth while SONO is negative at -3.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-101.25%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONO is 75.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
775.75%
AR growth while SONO is negative at -216.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
131.63%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONO's 311.49%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-271.96%
Negative yoy AP while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-104.35%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 106.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.62%
Negative yoy CFO while SONO is 162.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
6.35%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SONO's 14.40%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
94.72%
Acquisition growth of 94.72% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-18.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -14.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
20.81%
1.25-1.5x SONO's 17.04%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
21.15%
Growth of 21.15% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-6.18%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.84%
We slightly raise equity while SONO is negative at -150.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
100.00%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 88.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.