PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.72%
Negative net income growth while SONO stands at 95.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.73%
Negative yoy D&A while SONO is 4.69%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-114.47%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
4.39%
SBC growth while SONO is negative at -3.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-75.85%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONO is 75.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
672.84%
AR growth while SONO is negative at -216.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
34.30%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONO's 311.49%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-260.29%
Negative yoy AP while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-94.92%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 106.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.42%
Negative yoy CFO while SONO is 162.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.17%
CapEx growth well above SONO's 14.40%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-300.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-6.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -14.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
3.15%
Below 50% of SONO's 17.04%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-64.62%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-5.51%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-125.16%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
186.25%
We slightly raise equity while SONO is negative at -150.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-38.57%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONO is 88.91%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.