PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.62%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.87%
Less D&A growth vs. SONO's 4.69%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-112.05%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-2.28%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -3.73%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
228.29%
Well above SONO's 75.63% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-4852.94%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -216.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-166.89%
Negative yoy inventory while SONO is 311.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
6475.98%
AP growth of 6475.98% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
70.30%
Growth well above SONO's 106.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while SONO is 1546.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
51.65%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 162.75%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-39.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 14.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-2416.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-12.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -14.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
5.11%
Below 50% of SONO's 17.04%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
268.80%
Growth of 268.80% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-65.48%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 10.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-190.42%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.72%
Buyback growth below 50% of SONO's 88.91%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.