PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
98.48%
Net income growth of 98.48% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
17.23%
D&A growth of 17.23% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
673.91%
Deferred tax of 673.91% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
21.94%
SBC growth of 21.94% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
3.56%
Working capital change of 3.56% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
142.00%
AR growth of 142.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-92.69%
Negative yoy inventory while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-78.45%
Negative yoy AP while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
110.34%
Growth of 110.34% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.88%
CFO growth of 68.88% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
15.30%
CapEx growth of 15.30% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
88.74%
Acquisition growth of 88.74% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-78.69%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.55%
Liquidation growth of 43.55% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-149.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-158.51%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-80.07%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.