PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-38.35%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -156.52%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-21.93%
Negative yoy D&A while SONO is 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-5.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.11%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -0.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-187.79%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONO is 401.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
46.49%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. SONO's 222.01%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
65.86%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -141.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-478.94%
Negative yoy AP while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-726.19%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 108.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
123.72%
Some yoy increase while SONO is negative at -196.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-53.84%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -121.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
11.84%
CapEx growth well above SONO's 23.47%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-194.12%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.07%
Purchases growth of 16.07% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-11.63%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
190.38%
Growth of 190.38% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
25.73%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 23.47%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.01%
Buyback growth below 50% of SONO's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.