PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
87.28%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 406.59%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
10.51%
Some D&A expansion while SONO is negative at -9.66%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-2906.74%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 143.33%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
10.39%
SBC growth while SONO is negative at -0.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
35687.74%
Slight usage while SONO is negative at -74.22%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1.75%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -529.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
125.39%
Inventory growth well above SONO's 113.37%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-15.02%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -69.16%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
373.56%
Some yoy usage while SONO is negative at -260.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
54.17%
Well above SONO's 49.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
80.72%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 276.67%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
29.75%
CapEx growth well above SONO's 0.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-113.58%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-14.99%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.00%
Liquidation growth of 2.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
53.76%
Growth of 53.76% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-36.69%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-0.46%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-29.51%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.