PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.11%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -171.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.22%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONO at -2.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
98.52%
Well above SONO's 24.62% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
4.01%
SBC growth while SONO is negative at -0.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-105.64%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONO at -1457.52%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
263.25%
AR growth well above SONO's 266.27%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-846.77%
Negative yoy inventory while SONO is 81.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-295.25%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -534.46%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-130.76%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 151.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1172.73%
Both negative yoy, with SONO at -241.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-46.52%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -193.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-49.29%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 23.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
23.70%
Acquisition growth of 23.70% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
82.62%
Purchases growth of 82.62% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
29.59%
Liquidation growth of 29.59% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
702.33%
Growth of 702.33% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
311.26%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 23.77%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to SONO's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.42%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONO is 79.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.