PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.62%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 93.63%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.34%
Less D&A growth vs. SONO's 9.74%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-53.91%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 220.69%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.44%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -10.49%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
142.53%
Slight usage while SONO is negative at -133.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-3996.14%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -17.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
14.71%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -185.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
1174.40%
AP growth well above SONO's 91.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
112.63%
Some yoy usage while SONO is negative at -90.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
86.87%
Some yoy increase while SONO is negative at -41.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
34.75%
Operating cash flow growth similar to SONO's 31.89%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
6.92%
Some CapEx rise while SONO is negative at -142.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-130.16%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-64.42%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-8.80%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
69.96%
Growth of 69.96% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-176.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -142.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34000.00%
Issuance growth of 34000.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
8.08%
Buyback growth below 50% of SONO's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.