PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-42.09%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -137.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-10.46%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONO at -7.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-433.96%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-2.89%
Negative yoy SBC while SONO is 22.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-360.84%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONO at -381.38%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-42.22%
AR is negative yoy while SONO is 216.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
106.51%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -93.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-35.55%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -649.55%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
54.05%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONO's 183.32%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-198.15%
Negative yoy while SONO is 17.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-58.21%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -129.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
29.57%
CapEx growth well above SONO's 49.46%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
25.75%
Acquisition growth of 25.75% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
8.85%
Purchases growth of 8.85% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
33.46%
Liquidation growth of 33.46% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
253.57%
Growth of 253.57% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
128.41%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 49.46%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-169.46%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.