PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.26%
Some net income increase while SONO is negative at -111.29%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
8.39%
D&A growth well above SONO's 6.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-451.16%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 75.61%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.20%
SBC growth while SONO is negative at -2.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
177.20%
Slight usage while SONO is negative at -64.12%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1054.08%
AR is negative yoy while SONO is 52.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-152.26%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONO at -492.37%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
8027.73%
AP growth well above SONO's 60.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
163.98%
Growth well above SONO's 0.16%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-149.60%
Negative yoy while SONO is 751.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.11%
Some CFO growth while SONO is negative at -78.84%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-38.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -52.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
95.94%
Acquisition growth of 95.94% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-120.96%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-45.45%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-171.81%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-102.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -52.04%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-10.17%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
38900.00%
Issuance growth of 38900.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-2.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -499.25%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.