PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.62%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 132.31%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.82%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONO at -1.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-147.66%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
1.53%
Less SBC growth vs. SONO's 6.20%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
1001.63%
Slight usage while SONO is negative at -44.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
182.81%
AR growth well above SONO's 61.46%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
80.12%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -491.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
146.07%
Lower AP growth vs. SONO's 345.93%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
1.41%
Some yoy usage while SONO is negative at -125.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-101.82%
Both negative yoy, with SONO at -108.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
26.46%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 64.99%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-13.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 23.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
84.96%
Acquisition growth of 84.96% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
39.13%
Purchases growth of 39.13% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-4.88%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
62.08%
Growth of 62.08% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
207.09%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 23.75%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-421.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -99.94%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -957.55%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.