PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.82%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -86.98%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
4.91%
D&A growth well above SONO's 9.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-156.90%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-1.93%
Negative yoy SBC while SONO is 10.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-170.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONO at -233.26%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
178.56%
AR growth well above SONO's 176.59%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
70.95%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -157.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-209.22%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -363.89%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-77.55%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 306.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2096.00%
Negative yoy while SONO is 173.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-38.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -117.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.17%
CapEx growth well above SONO's 24.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.01%
Purchases growth of 13.01% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-22.57%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-20.78%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 24.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-250.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.93%
We have some buyback growth while SONO is negative at -181.07%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.