PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.98%
Negative net income growth while SONO stands at 3.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.25%
Less D&A growth vs. SONO's 3.67%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-255.70%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 252.53%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.06%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -4.98%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-24.29%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONO is 130.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-88.01%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -101.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
104.71%
Inventory growth well above SONO's 86.45%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
100.89%
AP growth well above SONO's 115.90%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-68.11%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONO at -7.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
56.91%
Well above SONO's 27.22%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-12.04%
Negative yoy CFO while SONO is 283.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
7.76%
Some CapEx rise while SONO is negative at -72.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.31%
Purchases growth of 43.31% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.07%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.45%
We have mild expansions while SONO is negative at -72.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
14.29%
Debt repayment well below SONO's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-21.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -157.93%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.